My May beer of the month is the Tall Poppy India Red Ale by 8 Wired Beer.
I thought I’d picked it because I tried the 8 Wired HopWired IPA last month and found it kind of blah, but 8 Wired promise the India Red Ale is intense, sharp, complex, big, and bold. And indeed it proved to be. This was much better than the IPA: huge flavors, tons of caramel, and a bite that won’t quit. Would definitely buy again.
But maybe I didn’t buy Tall Poppy because of the IPA. Maybe it was because I heard Meghan Trainor’s Me Too in May. I was literally struck dumb with shock at the transgression of her saying “I like myself” for three minutes and three seconds.
This is because I grew up fertilized by tall poppy syndrome. All Kiwis did. There were two worst insults thrown around the schoolyard: saying “You love yourself!” and calling someone a “Try hard.” As in, to try is wrong. Not, you’re so dumb you have to try, but rather, it is wrong to exert oneself – especially intellectually – for the sake of achievement. Unless you’re playing a team sport. Then it’s ok. As long as you don’t celebrate winning.
These epithets weren’t just for kids, either. I clearly remember on the first day of a new job, right out of school, being asked to lunch by three new colleagues. In the lift on the way down I surreptitiously checked my reflection in the mirrored tiles surrounding the lift buttons, looking for smeared eyeliner or lipstick. One male colleague immediately cried, “Ew, she looked right at herself. You love yourself, you love yourself!”
Peter Hartcher describes the purpose of Australian tall poppy syndrome as a defence against superior airs, that “it isn’t success that offends Australians” but someone thinking they are better than the next guy. That wasn’t the case here. It was success itself that had to be downplayed. And Wikipedia has it wrong, too. Tall poppy syndrome wasn’t “resentment or envy of the success of a peer.” It’s not wishing you could have that success too. It’s egalitarianism as oppression: enforced equality at the lowest common denominator.
When I was in university I was approached by a lecturer who asked me to attend a function that evening. A bunch of students were receiving awards. But, she said, “Please don’t tell anyone. It would make other students feel bad if they knew some people were being singled out for achievement.” So about a dozen of us received our awards under cover of darkness, with no one the wiser. The following year they did away even with this small ritual. I got a certificate and a cheque in the mail, and no one ever said a word to me out loud.
You’d see this in our sports, too. Check out this brilliant intercept try by All Black great Stu Wilson, in 1981.
He stands and walks away like he failed. Like he’s just been told his dog died. His team mates turn their backs on him and jog back to the restart. This was more than normal, this was admirable. This was the only way to comport yourself and still hold the respect of those around you. A girl I knew wasn’t allowed to do gymnastics because her dad – a professional musician – was afraid she’d get “full of herself” i.e. develop a smidgeon of self esteem.
This doesn’t just hold us back as individuals, it holds the country back economically, too. Happily, things are changing. All Blacks actually celebrate tries, now. Their team mates congratulate them.
Now Kiwis can see for ourselves that the world is wider than our tiny cloudy shores, that people in other places don’t mind standing out. Success can be good. Outperforming other people can be beneficial. I admire Americans so much for their cultural self-confidence. I’d like to get me some of that.
But the culture I grew up with is still ingrained in my bones, to the extent that I half-pie look around when Trainor sings, “If I was you, I’d wanna be me too,” and wonder how long until someone stops her. Until someone cuts her down with a scythe for being so presumptuous to say, “I fucking rock.” Changing the habits of a lifetime is hard work.
I bought Me Too. It’s on my iPod now. You better watch out. I may become unstoppable.
“…enforced equality at the lowest common denominator.”
Just yikes. O.O
yeah 😦
thank fuck for the internet.
No doubt… but ugh, those years before the internet had to be especially rough. *hug*
*hugs back*
No one likes a Boasty McBoast Face, but this whole tall poppy thing kind of flummoxes my American sensibilities. I’m curious, do universities grade on a curve?
high schools did when I was at school, but they stopped right after I left. Universities don’t. And a pass here is 50%, which I gather is not the case in the US, sometimes/place at least? Now a pass is functionally >40%, because if you mark a student 43-49% it’s guaranteed they will appeal the grade, and therefore rather than making the university go through the hassle of this, it’s unofficial policy to just pass a kid who was going to get 40-49%. If you felt a student was going to fail, you had to REALLY fail them – make sure they finished the year with 30-39% max.
With the high school grade curve, traditionally our school leaving qualification was School Certificate (School C) which you sat at 15. Worse than mere grading to the curve, the grades available at your school were determined by the previous year’s raw scores by students at your school. So say, for example, no one at your school passed last year before grading. This meant no matter how well you did, you would be failed this year. At a small rural school with 6 students, this could easily happen. The system was very unfair.
But now we have a non-exam based system (NCEA). You get ‘credits’ for assignments all through the year. My daughter gained credits for knowing how a filing cabinet operated and how to answer a telephone.
also, if I was to apply for a non-academic job I would have to lie about having an MA, let alone a PhD. No one would hire someone with those kinds of qualifications.
Curve grading happened at the university, not in high school. And mostly for the STEM courses. I don’t recall if it was policy or at the professor’s discretion.